<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Wood Whisperer &#187; water-borne</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thewoodwhisperer.com/tag/water-borne/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thewoodwhisperer.com</link>
	<description>Education and Entertainment for the modern woodworker.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 18:59:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Water-Borne vs. Water-Based</title>
		<link>http://thewoodwhisperer.com/water-borne-vs-water-based/</link>
		<comments>http://thewoodwhisperer.com/water-borne-vs-water-based/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 03:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>thewoodwhisperer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Finishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water-based]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water-borne]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thewoodwhisperer.com/?p=1035</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What is the difference between water-based and water-borne.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This weeks question comes from Yoann.  </p>
<blockquote><p>What is the difference between &#8220;water-based&#8221; and &#8220;waterborne&#8221; finishes, is it the same?  If not, can any finish be either water-based or waterborne?  Thanks for the clarification !!</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://thewoodwhisperer.com/images/2008/09/high_performance.jpg" rel="shadowbox[sbpost-1035];player=img;"><img src="http://thewoodwhisperer.com/images/2008/09/high_performance-100x100.jpg" alt="" title="high_performance" width="100" height="100" class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-13455" /></a>Hey Yoann. Great question!  This is just another example of labels not doing us any favors!  As most people use it, the term &#8220;water-based&#8221; is pretty much a misnomer. To call something water-based suggests that you can redissolve it in water, which is not the case with these finishes. These water-containing finishes are actually still solvent based.  And if memory serves me, I believe the reason folks started calling them &#8220;water-based&#8221; was to distinguish them from traditional solvent-based finishes.</p>
<p>So how do these finishes work? The most common mixtures generally contain three main components: the polyurethane or acrylic, a solvent (usually glycol ether), and water. After the finish is applied to a surface, the water begins to evaporate. Soon after, the solvent evaporates and the finish particles fuse together to become a single layer. So even though these finishes are solvent-based, water is the carrier, hence the term, &#8220;water-borne&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thewoodwhisperer.com/water-borne-vs-water-based/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 1/9 queries in 0.007 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 255/266 objects using disk: basic

Served from: thewoodwhisperer.com @ 2012-02-09 11:52:06 -->
