Water-Borne vs. Water-Based – Question of the Week
This weeks question comes from Yoann. He asks: What is the difference between “water-based” and “waterborne” finishes, is it the same? If not, can any finish be either water-based or waterborne?
Thanks for the clarification !!
Hey Yoann. Not a stupid question at all. Its another example of labels not doing us any favors! As most people use it, the term “water-based” is pretty much a misnomer. To call something water-based suggests that you can redissolve it in water, which is not the case with these finishes. These water-containing finishes are actually still solvent based. And if memory serves me, I believe the reason folks started calling them “water-based” was to distinguish them from traditional solvent-based finishes.
So how do these finishes work? The most common mixtures generally contain three main components: the polyurethane or acrylic, a solvent (usually glycol ether), and water. After the finish is applied to a surface, the water begins to evaporate. Soon after, the solvent evaporates and the finish particles fuse together to become a single layer. So even though these finishes are solvent-based, water is the carrier, hence the term, “water-borne”.















